Services Provided
Continuum undertook a forensic assessment of the viability case and provided support to both Trafford Council and their Barrister (QC) on all matter pertaining to viability in planning, regularly attending meetings and identifying the key areas of viability challenge.
We opened dialogue with the appellant’s viability consultant in order to produce a joint Statement of Common Ground (SOCG). A proof of evidence on viability and subsequent rebuttal were also produced for the planning inquiry
Continuum Director, Murray Lloyd, provided evidence at the planning inquiry as an expert witness and Continuum supported Trafford Council’s Barrister (QC) at the inquiry during their cross examination of the viability and cost consultant acting on behalf of the appellant.
Outputs
The key issues considered at the planning inquiry related to the calculation of benchmark land value (BLV) and the estimation of sales values. Continuum produced an appraisal, which showed the scheme could support a compliant affordable housing provision. The position demonstrated in the appraisal undertaken by Continuum showing that the scheme could support its full planning policy contributions, was supported by Trafford Council and their barrister (QC).
The inspector found that the applicant had assumed costs too high and values too low, this was seen to effectively reduce the developers risk at the expense of the public purse. The overall conclusion was the scheme provided sufficient residual value to fund 45% affordable housing and full S106 contributions.
For several reasons including that of viability, the appeal was dismissed by the inspector and costs awarded to Trafford Council.